Collecting debt in California: licensing, bonds and statutes of limitations.
Under the Debt Collection Licensing Act (operative January 1, 2022) any person regularly engaged in consumer debt collection, including debt buyers and out-of-state collectors reaching California debtors, must hold a DFPI debt collector license issued through NMLS, pay a $350 application fee and $150 investigation fee, post a $25,000 minimum surety bond, and pay an annual pro rata assessment of at least $250 due January 1.
General information, not legal advice. Every figure on this page links to the statute, rule or regulator page it came from, with the operative words quoted, and the date we verified it. Rules change; confirm with the regulator or your counsel before acting, and tell us if something here is out of date.
Do you need a license to collect in California?
California licenses consumer debt collectors and debt buyers through NMLS ($350 application plus $150 investigation fee, $25,000 minimum bond, annual assessment of at least $250 due January 1) and the license reaches out-of-state agencies collecting from California residents; no branch licenses are needed. The Act has no attorney or first-party creditor exemption, and DFPI's proposed rule that would add limited carve-outs has not been adopted.
Amount field is the statutory minimum. § 100019(e): minimum $25,000 surety bond payable to the commissioner, issued by an insurer authorized in California; § 100019(e)(2): 'The commissioner may require a higher bond amount for a licensee based on the number of affiliates under the license and the dollar amount of collecting consumer debt by that licensee.' A $25,000 refundable deposit may substitute temporarily while a replacement bond is obtained after a claim (§ 100019(e)(1)). 10 CCR 1850.50(c): 'For purposes of obtaining a license, an applicant shall initially file a surety bond of at least $25,000' on the NMLS electronic surety bond form 'SURETY BOND, DEBT COLLECTION LICENSING ACT LICENSEE BOND' (ESB Form Version 1 Effective 07/01/2021); cancellation requires 60 calendar days' notice to the Commissioner. Regulation operative 12-22-2021 (Register 2021, No. 52).
DFPI FAQ: 'All applications, amendments, surety bonds, notices, related filings, supporting documents, renewals, authorizations, assessments, and fees required to be filed with the Commissioner will need to be filed electronically with and transmitted through NMLS'; paper applications are not accepted. Statute defines NMLS (§ 100002(o)) and authorizes electronic surety bonds and assessment payment through NMLS (§§ 100019(e), 100020(e)). NMLS license type: CA-DFPI Debt Collection License. The NMLS state checklist PDF could not be retrieved by either pass.
$350 application fee plus $150 investigation fee per applicant, nonrefundable. § 100007(b)(1): 'An application fee, of three hundred fifty dollars ($350), and an investigation fee, the amount of which shall be determined by the department, to cover any costs incurred in processing an application, including a fingerprint processing and criminal history record check under Section 100009.' 10 CCR 1850.7(b): 'An application fee of $350 and an investigation fee of $150 per applicant shall be paid through NMLS.' DFPI FAQ: 'There is an application fee of $350 and an investigation fee of $150 per applicant.' Affiliates may share a single license and a single $350 application fee, but each affiliate pays the $150 investigation fee and files its own Form MU1. NMLS processing, credit-report and fingerprint/CA DOJ fees are extra and paid to NMLS (amounts not recorded; NMLS checklist not retrievable). Once licensed as of July 1 the licensee also owes the annual assessment.
annual, renews January 1 (annual assessment payment deadline; commissioner notifies licensees by September 30; no fixed license expiration date in the statute)
§ 100001(a): 'A separate license is not required for each individual branch office.' DFPI FAQ: branch offices must be registered in NMLS (Form MU3); 'Fingerprinting is still suspended for Branch Managers.' § 100018(b)(3): notice of new or changed branch locations within 30 days. Affiliated companies may operate under a single license (§ 100003(b)(2); 10 CCR 1850.7(b)). Fictitious business names must be filed in NMLS with county-stamped FBN statements and approved before use (10 CCR 1850.7(a)(1)). Periodic examination costs are billed at DFPI's estimated average hourly cost (§ 100023). DFPI fee index lists '$150 renewal' against 10 CCR 1850.7, which mislabels the $150 investigation fee; the regulation text controls.
NMLS Company Account and Form MU1 application, with Form MU2 for control persons (10 CCR 1850.6, 1850.7); fingerprints and criminal history background check for every MU2 filer (§§ 100008, 100009; 10 CCR 1850.9); credit reports via NMLS (10 CCR 1850.6(b)(3)); sample initial validation letter under 15 U.S.C. 1692g to be used with California consumers, filed with the application (§ 100007(c)); California registered agent for service of process and appointment of the Commissioner as agent (10 CCR 1850.7(a)(2), 1850.8); organizational chart of direct and indirect owners and affiliates (10 CCR 1850.7(a)(5)); fictitious business name statements for each trade name, no collection under a DBA until approved (10 CCR 1850.7(a)(1)); written policies and procedures to promote compliance; submit to periodic examination (§ 100019(a), (d)); annual report under oath by March 15 covering California debtor accounts and net proceeds, filed via the DFPI Self-Service Portal; reports are public (§ 100021; 10 CCR 1850.70); annual pro rata assessment, minimum $250, paid through NMLS by January 1 (§ 100020); notify the Commissioner within 30 days of changes to application information; 10 days' prior notice of a principal office move (§ 100018); designated email address in the DFPI Self-Service Portal (DFPI FAQ); license number must appear in communications with debtors (Civ. Code § 1788.11 per DFPI FAQ)
Exemptions. § 100001(b)(1): division does not apply to a depository institution (Fin. Code § 1420); persons licensed under Fin. Code Division 9 (California Financing Law) or Division 20 (California Residential Mortgage Lending Act); Department of Real Estate licensees (Bus. & Prof. Code Div. 4, Part 1); persons subject to the Karnette Rental-Purchase Act; or a trustee performing nonjudicial foreclosure acts. § 100001(c): does not apply to debt collection regulated under the Student Loan Servicing Act (Div. 12.5) or to collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit as defined in the Rosenthal Act (added by SB 1286, Stats. 2024, Ch. 522, effective January 1, 2025). The Commissioner retains § 100005 enforcement authority over Rosenthal Act violations by exempt persons (§ 100001(b)(2)). No attorney, original-creditor or nonprofit exemption in the statute; proposed 10 CCR 1850.1 (PRO 05/21) would add several but is not adopted as of 2026-09-20.
How long can a debt be sued on in California?
California gives written contracts, including credit cards, four years, and since July 1, 2024 consumer debt can no longer be sued on as a book account or account stated. A payment never revives a time-barred debt, but a signed written acknowledgment can, and any collector writing to a consumer about a time-barred debt must include the Rosenthal Act notice that the debt cannot be sued on.
“Within four years: (a) An action upon any contract, obligation or liability founded upon an instrument in writing, except as provided in Section 336a”
“Within two years: 1. An action upon a contract, obligation or liability not founded upon an instrument of writing, except as provided in Section 2725 of the Commercial Code or subdivision 2 of Section 337 of this code”
“an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time shall be commenced within six years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within six years after the accelerated due date.”
“Under California law, a four-year statute of limitations applies to actions for breach of contract, account stated, and open book account. (Code Civ. Proc., § 337.)”
Credit cards get four years under § 337 whether pleaded as written contract (§ 337(a)), account stated (§ 337(b)(2)) or, historically, open book account (§ 337(b)(1)). Lauron (Cal. Ct. App. 2017) treated a credit-card collection suit as, in gravamen, breach of the written cardmember agreement even though pleaded as common counts ('the mere fact that PCC labeled its claims "account stated" and "open book account" does not mean the gravamen of its complaint is not breach of contract'), and enforced the agreement's Delaware choice-of-law clause so Delaware's three-year period governed that card. For consumer debt incurred on or after July 1, 2024, AB 1414 (Stats. 2023, ch. 688, eff. Jan. 1, 2024) amended § 337a ('A "book account" does not include consumer debt', defined in § 337a(b) as an obligation 'incurred on or after July 1, 2024' for personal, family or household purposes 'where the obligation to pay appears on the face of a note or in a written contract') and added § 425.30(a) ('In an action for collection of consumer debt, common counts may not be used', listing open book account and account stated). So post-July-2024 consumer credit-card suits must be pleaded on the written contract (§ 337(a), four years, accruing on breach) or, absent a writing, § 339(1), two years. Older accounts still follow Lauron. § 337(b) text: 'upon a book account whether consisting of one or more entries; (2) upon an account stated based upon an account in writing, but the acknowledgment of the account stated need not be in writing.' Reconciler re-read § 337 on leginfo and confirmed the text.
“upon the expiration of 10 years after the date of entry of a money judgment or a judgment for possession or sale of property: (a) The judgment may not be enforced. (b) All enforcement procedures pursuant to the judgment or to a writ or order issued pursuant to the judgment shall cease.”
Code Civ. Proc. § 312: actions must be commenced within the prescribed periods 'after the cause of action shall have accrued.' Breach of contract (including credit-card agreements): Lauron, quoting Waxman v. Citizens Nat. Trust & Sav. Bk. (1954) 123 Cal.App.2d 145, 149: 'Ordinarily, a cause of action for breach of contract accrues on the failure of the promisor to do the thing contracted for at the time and in the manner contracted'; for a credit card, 'it accrued when Lauron failed to pay for transactions made on her account by the date and time set forth on her billing statement.' Book account / account stated: 'if an account stated is based upon an account of more than one item, the time shall begin to run from the date of the last item' (§ 337(b)); Lauron: 'Actions to recover on an account stated or a book account accrue on the date of the last item or entry in the account' (citing R.N.C. Inc. v. Tsegeletos (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 967). Negotiable notes: stated or accelerated due date (Com. Code § 3118(a)). § 337(d): once the period has run 'a person shall not bring suit or initiate an arbitration or other legal proceeding to collect the debt. The period in which an action may be commenced under this section shall only be extended pursuant to Section 360.' Charge-off is not an accrual trigger under any statute read; Civ. Code §§ 1788.52(a)(3) and 1788.58(a)(5) require debt buyers to state 'the date of default or the date of the last payment' but do not define accrual. Judgments: 10 years from entry; a renewal application filed before expiration extends enforceability 10 years from filing (§§ 683.120(b), 683.130(a)); no renewal within five years of a prior renewal (§ 683.110(b)); personal-debt judgments under $50,000 and medical judgments under $200,000 against a natural person renewable only once, for five years (§ 683.110(c), § 683.120(c)).
“any payment on account of principal or interest due on a promissory note made by the party to be charged shall be deemed a sufficient acknowledgment or promise of a continuing contract to stop, from time to time as any such payment is made, the running of the time ... and to start the running of a new period of time”
“No acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, by which to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same is contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby”
Quote: 'When a cause of action has arisen in another State, or in a foreign country, and by the laws thereof an action thereon cannot there be maintained against a person by reason of the lapse of time, an action thereon shall not be maintained against him in this State, except in favor of one who has been a citizen of this State, and who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued.' Separately, Lauron shows a cardmember agreement's choice-of-law clause (Delaware) can import a shorter foreign limitations period into a California collection suit under a Restatement § 187 analysis, because 'California allows contracting parties to modify the length of the otherwise applicable California statute of limitations' and the court found no conflict with fundamental California policy.
The debt exists but cannot be sued on; a suit can be defended by raising the defense.
“The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.”
§ 1788.14(d) forbids 'Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices': (1) the quoted notice, in 'the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred,' if the debt is within the FCRA § 605(a) reporting window; (2) if past the FCRA obsolescence date: 'The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.' § 1788.14(f) defines 'first written communication' to include email and fax. § 1788.52(d)(2)-(3) imposes the identical two notices on debt buyers with their first written communication. Suits are also barred: § 337(d) ('When the period in which an action must be commenced under this section has run, a person shall not bring suit or initiate an arbitration or other legal proceeding to collect the debt') and Civ. Code § 1788.56 for debt buyers. The Rosenthal Act (§ 1788.2) covers original creditors as 'debt collectors', so § 1788.14(d) reaches first-party collectors. § 1788.14 was last amended by SB 1286 (Stats. 2024, ch. 522), eff. Jan. 1, 2025, extending the Act to 'covered debt' including certain commercial debt.
§ 360 addresses the barred debt directly for notes: a payment on a promissory note stops the running and starts a new period 'but no such payment of itself shall revive a cause of action once barred.' For non-note debt (credit cards, open accounts) § 360 gives payment no tolling effect at all; only 'some writing, signed by the party to be charged' can take the case out of the title. § 337(d): the § 337 period 'shall only be extended pursuant to Section 360.' A signed written acknowledgment or promise does revive an already-barred debt: Buescher v. Lastar (1976) 61 Cal.App.3d 73 (demand note barred Sept. 10, 1969; letters written in 1970-71 held sufficient under § 360; 'The unqualified recognition of the legally expired obligation creates by law an implicit waiver of the statute of limitations and a promise by appellant to pay'), and Easton v. Ash (1941) 18 Cal.2d 530 ('It is well settled in California that a pre-existing debt, although barred by the statute of limitations, is sufficient consideration to support a new acknowledgment of or promise to pay the indebtedness'; a signed renewal agreement was 'sufficient not only to revive the indebtedness but to renew the original mortgage as well'). A conditional acknowledgment revives only if its condition is met (Buescher, discussing Maurer v. Bernardo (1931) 118 Cal.App. 290). Waivers of the limitations defense must be written and signed and last at most four years, renewable (§ 360.5). The debt is unenforceable, not extinguished: § 337(d) bars suit, arbitration or other legal proceeding, and §§ 1788.14(d) and 1788.52(d) contemplate continued out-of-court collection with the mandated notice.
Where this page comes from.
Researched in two independent passes from primary sources (the statute, the administrative code and the regulator's own pages), then reconciled against the text where the passes disagreed. Verified 2026-09-20. Licensing is re-verified quarterly and limitation periods annually.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100000.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100001.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100002.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100003.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100005.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100007.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100011.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=100014.&lawCode=FIN
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=100018.&lawCode=FIN
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100019.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100020.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=FIN§ionNum=100021.
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=FIN&division=25.&title=&part=&chapter=1.&article=
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.2.
- www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/10-CCR-1850.6
- www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/10-CCR-1850.7
- www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/10-CCR-1850.8
- www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/10-CCR-1850.50
- dfpi.ca.gov/regulated-industries/debt-collection-licensee/
- dfpi.ca.gov/debt-collection-licensee/
- dfpi.ca.gov/rules-enforcement/laws-and-regulations/laws-and-regulations-debt-collection-licensing-act/
- dfpi.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/PRO-05-21-TEXT-DCLA-3rd-Prefiling.pdf
- dfpi.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/DFPI-ADM-510-Index-of-Fees_-Fines-and-Penalties-Rev.-10-25.pdf
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=312
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=335
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=337
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=337a
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=337.5
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=338
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=339
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=360
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=360.5
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=361
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=425.30
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=683.020
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=683.030
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=683.110
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=683.120
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=683.130
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=683.220
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=685.010
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=COM§ionNum=3118
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.2
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.14
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.14.5
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.50
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.52
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.56
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1788.58
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB1414
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB1414
- law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2017/h042686.html
- www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/H042686.PDF
- static.case.law/cal-app-3d/61/cases/0073-01.json
- static.case.law/cal-2d/18/cases/0530-01.json
- www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?q=%22Professional+Collection+Consultants%22+Lauron&type=o
- www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/search/?type=o&q=%22section+360%22+%22revive%22+%22acknowledgment%22+barred&court=cal+calctapp
Resolvah enforces the California rules at the point of contact.
Licensing by state, time-barred rules, call frequency and consent, checked before anything sends. See it on your own portfolio.